FOIL Request #R000082-032026 — May 8, 2026 Production

What 49 Days of Stalling Bought Us: 93 Documents That Tell the Story NYSTA Tried Not to.

Every document the New York State Thruway Authority produced in response to FOIL Request #R000082-032026, organized by the seven categories of the original request. Cite them. Read them. Dig in.

At a Glance

93

records catalogued

49

day stall

7

FOIL items requested

0

Alternative Site Analysis records

Records arrived on May 8, 2026 — two business days after our constructive-denial appeal clock expired. NYSTA's own appeal determination counts the production as “94 records … 1,664 pages.” The appeal was denied in full on May 22, 2026; the next step is an Article 78 proceeding.

Update — May 22, 2026: Appeal Denied in Full

We Appealed. They Denied Everything — and Handed Us the Number They Were Hiding.

On May 8 we appealed the redactions and the missing records. On May 22, NYSTA Appeals Officer Christine Fernandez denied the appeal in its entirety, calling it “final agency action” under POL §89(4)(b). But the denial came with four more documents— and they do more damage than the silence did. Here is the follow-up production, and what it proves.

The Follow-Up Documents (4)

What the Follow-Up Proves

  • The rent reconstructs itself. NYSTA’s own Condition Rider (§III.D) says the Authority’s Annual Fee rises by 50% of each carrier’s co-locator fee. Apply that to the rents they just released — Verizon $2,950/mo + AT&T $2,750/mo — and NYSTA’s take is roughly $2,850/month ≈ $34,200/year today, climbing toward ~$50,000/year once T-Mobile (already a designed co-locator) loads on, across a 25-year horizon. They redacted the number; their own formula plus their own disclosure rebuilds it. (Reconstruction, not a figure NYSTA disclosed.)
  • They never produced the fee at all.The Rider says the Annual Fee is “stated on the first page of this Occupancy Permit” (§III.A) and billed in quarterly installments (§III.B). No figure, no invoice — despite Item 5 expressly demanding the payment records of what NYSTA receives. That is a constructive denial.
  • They switched legal excuses mid-stream. Fernandez concedes §87(2)(b) was likely wrong and reaches for §87(2)(i) — an IT-securityexemption that has nothing to do with a contract fee — while voluntarily releasing comparable carrier financial terms in the same breath.
  • Their sworn certification contradicts their own files. It swears “no records” for the Verizon RFDS (a requiredsubmission per the produced collocation application), the $50,000 bond (required by produced permit §IX.B), and the lift plan (required by NYSTA’s own engineering review) — and its search-methodology paragraph is blank.
  • No Alternative Site Analysis — now under oath. The State has sworn that no engineering or planning record justifies putting a 184-foot commercial tower in a residential highway infield.

The administrative road is over. The next filing is an Article 78 in NYS Supreme Court — to compel the Annual Fee, the quarterly invoices, the underlying agreements, and a conforming certification — plus a §89(4)(c) fee demand, a Committee on Open Government advisory opinion, and Authorities Budget Office / State Comptroller referrals.

Full breakdown in the May 22 movement update. The financial mechanics are dissected on The Loophole Kings.

How to Read This Catalog

  • Each category lists what NYSTA produced, what was redacted, and what NYSTA did not produce.
  • Filenames have been normalized to lowercase, hyphenated URLs. Original NYSTA filenames are referenced inline where helpful for cross-checking against the response cover letter.
  • Redactions cited under New York Public Officers Law §87(2)(b) are largely indefensible for corporate financial terms. See /the-facts/loophole-kings for the full breakdown.
  • Daniel’s personal FOIL appeal letter is intentionally not hosted in this catalog — it’s a private legal pleading.
Item 1

Permits & Lease Agreements

PTI Occupancy Permit T3U250002, Anchor Tenant and Tenant Install Amendments, Construction Permits, Site/Structural Agreements. Section II.A of the PTI Permit is the most consequential sentence in the entire response: "There is no term. This Occupancy Permit is revocable, unilaterally, upon demand by the Authority."

Produced (22)

NYSTA Building Permit SYR-2025-003 (12/2/2025)

Issued December 2, 2025 by Joshua Stagnitti, Code Compliance Specialist (expires December 1, 2028). Reference R3642. Filename misleadingly labeled 'AT_T_Exit_37_Permit.pdf' — actual permittee is PTI. Documents the 30 kW diesel generator + 145-gallon belly tank. Future FOIL targets: 3rd Party Concrete Inspection Report, 3rd Party Electrical Inspection, Footing before pouring, Final Completion.

PTI Occupancy Permit T3U250002 (Redacted)

22-page Condition Rider issued June 23, 2025 by Trevor Thieme. Section II.A: unilaterally revocable by NYSTA. The Annual Fee the Rider says is 'stated on the first page' (§III.A) does not appear in the production. PDF metadata indicates the redacted version was finalized April 28, 2026 — 10 days before NYSTA released it.

PTI Occupancy Permit T3U250002 — Occupancy Permit version (Redacted)

AT&T Anchor Tenant Amendment (Redacted)

Filed jointly under PTI / AT&T. Duration: "TBD" for both start and end dates.

Verizon Tenant Install Amendment (Redacted)

Verizon contracting entity is Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC, signed by Jack Redmond.

PTI Occupancy & Work Permit (ta-w5124)

Verizon Occupancy & Work Permit (ta-w5124)

Verizon Occupancy Supplement (ta-w5123)

PTI Construction Permit (original)

PTI Construction Permit — 11/6/2025 (final)

Final construction permit. Discloses 30 kW diesel generator + 145-gallon belly tank.

Verizon Electronics Parkway CP Application — 8/27/2025

PTI / General Contractor Access Permit

AT&T Site License Agreement (2/18/2025)

AT&T Updates to Structural Analysis

Verizon Structural Analysis (TEP)

Park & Ride Sister Site — Verizon Structural Analysis

AT&T Scope of Work

AT&T Updated Platform

Verizon Exit 37 Permit

Exit 37 Cell Tower Permit

US-NY-2029 / NY-2030 New Site Builds

Electronics Parkway PTI Scope of Work (RTF)

Redacted

  • Personal phone numbers and email addresses for individual NYSTA staff and PTI personnel.
  • The Annual Fee figure the Rider says is stated on the permit's first page (§III.A) does not appear — withheld or never produced, not visibly redacted.

Not Produced

  • The PTI–AT&T Master Lease Agreement dated 8/22/2017 (referenced in the AT&T Site Lease).
  • The PTI–T-Mobile co-location agreement (Verizon and AT&T agreements were produced on appeal; T-Mobile's was not).
  • Insurance certificates (ACORD 25, U-26.3) referenced in the application.
  • The $50,000 Performance/Restoration bond instrument required by Condition Rider §IX.B — NYSTA's §89(3)(a) certification swears no such record exists, though its own permit requires it.
Item 2

Environmental & Engineering Reviews

SEQRA Negative Declaration with NYSTA as self-designated Lead Agency, NEPA review, ASCE Hazard Reports, structural analyses, geotechnical investigations, wetlands delineation, and the engineering review trail that documents missing structural reports, missing hazard reports, and a foundation-type mismatch caught by NYSTA's own engineer Joshua Stagnitti.

Produced (40)

Sabre Industries Structural Design Report Rev B (7/15/2025)

36-page sealed structural design report (Job 25-3277-JDS-R1, Rev B). Engineer of record: Robert Beacom, Sabre Industries (Alvarado TX). Standard: ANSI/TIA-222-H (NY Code Chapter 35 references the older TIA-222-G-2005). Design wind 109 mph, design ice 1.50", Risk Category II, Site Class D (DEFAULT — not field-verified). Base moment 6,352.75 ft-kips. Two foundation options designed; type undecided.

AT&T Construction Drawings Rev 2 (11/7/2025) — Liverpool BOCES

23 sheets. Engineer of Record: Joseph R. Johnston, P.E. (NY License #091187). Sheet T01 discloses zoning district as R-O (Residence-Office), parcel 75-01-11.1, coordinates 43°06'06.87"N 76°11'06.26"W, AT&T applicant office 404 Smith St, Syracuse NY 13224. Sheet A05 contains AT&T's RF Table. Confirms 30 kW diesel + 145-gallon belly tank ground scope.

AT&T Mount Analysis Report — Airosmith (12/20/2024)

Engineer of record: Joseph R. Johnston, P.E. (NY License #091187). Author: Andrew D. Vargo, P.E. Firm: Airosmith Engineering, Saratoga Springs NY (NY COA #17285). Mount: SitePro1 F4P-12W. DCR 71.4% (Pass). Equipment: 8× Commscope NNH4-65C-R6H4 panels + 16 Ericsson radios across Bands 5/12/14/25/66/77 + 3 Raycap surge protectors. AT&T site name 'Liverpool BOCES'.

FAA 7460-1 Determination of No Hazard 2024-AEA-11624-OE — TOWER

Issued 11/12/2024. Sponsor Mitchell Henry / PTI. Includes full frequency table: 6–7 GHz, 10–11.7 GHz, 17.7–19.7 GHz, 21.2–23.6 GHz (microwave backhaul ERP to 55 dBW); cellular 614–2690 MHz across multiple bands (ERPs up to 1640W PCS, 2000W 700MHz/WCS, 3500W paging). Marking/lighting NOT required for aviation safety.

FAA 7460-1 Determination 2025-AEA-11322-OE — CONSTRUCTION CRANE

Issued 9/22/2025 (expires 3/22/2027). Crane operator: Clark Rigging & Rental, contact Mike Dombroski, 945 Spencer Street, Syracuse NY 13204. Crane height during construction: 220 ft AGL / 655 ft AMSL — taller than the finished tower.

NYSTA SEQRA R3 Final (Negative Declaration, Type I action)

NYSTA self-designated Lead Agency. The bald eagle dismissal cites the USFWS Northeast Determination Key — a self-serve web tool, not a USFWS letter.

SEQRA Determination Letter to Salina (final, with attachments)

SEQRA Determination Letter — Certified Mail Receipt

USPS Certified Mail #7019 1640 0000 0800 4105, addressed to former Town Supervisor Nicholas Paro.

NEPA Review R1 (3/24/2025)

NEPA Correspondence and Public Notice

ENB Notice (Environmental Notice Bulletin)

ASCE Design Hazards Report — Exit 37 Liverpool

ASCE Hazard Report — Exit 37 Liverpool

ASCE Hazard Report — Park & Ride sister site

Tower Drawings + Foundation Drawings (Stamped)

Verizon Drawings (T3U250002)

Sheet C-3 references RF Antenna Design Sheet (RFDS Project ID 17326150). That document is not in the FOIL response.

Verizon Construction Drawings

Verizon Electronics Parkway CDfinal — 10/7/2025

Electronics Parkway CDfinal — 10/10/2025

NYSTA Exit 37 CDfinal — 6/17/2025

NYSTA Exit 37 Sketch — 9/4/2024 (earliest design artifact)

NYSTA Exit 37 Sketch — 10/1/2024 (revision)

First Plan Submission — 10/10/2024

Second Plan Submission — 4/11/2025

Geotechnical Investigation — Exit 37 Liverpool

Geotechnical Investigation — T3U250002

Tectonic Engineering, B-1 boring drilled 11/6/2024 to 50 ft depth. Groundwater at 28.10 ft below grade.

Geotechnical Investigation — Park & Ride sister site

Wetlands Delineation Report

FAA 1A Survey Certification

Topographic Survey

Engineering Review — Verizon, 10/3/2025

Item C-8 Detail 2: Verizon's first-round footer at 3'-6" was below NY Code minimum of 4'.

Engineering Review — Verizon Round 2, 10/10/2025

Verizon Exit 37 Review Responses — 10/7/2025

Engineering Review — 6/2/2025 (DOCX)

Stagnitti: "Structural Analysis Reports have not been submitted. Hazard Reports have not been submitted. Engineered lift plans have not been submitted."

Engineering Review — 6/2/2025 (PDF)

NYSTA Comments — Engineering Review 6/2/2025

Engineering Review Round 2 — 6/26/2025

Engineering Review Round 2 — Responses 6/26/2025

Engineering Review — AT&T 8/27/2025

Items #20–23: Construction Permit Application, Geotechnical Report, ASCE Hazard Reports, and FEAF all not submitted as of late August 2025. Item #18: foundation-type mismatch (drilled pier vs. pad/pier). Item #3: ANSI/TIA-222-H standard mismatch with NY Building Code Chapter 35 (which references 222-G-2005).

Engineering Review — AT&T Round 2, 11/6/2025

Redacted

  • Personal email addresses of NYSTA reviewers and PTI/carrier engineers (technical text appears largely un-redacted).

Not Produced

  • RF Antenna Design Sheet (Verizon RFDS Project ID 17326150) — referenced in the Verizon construction drawings, not produced.
  • AT&T RFDS — not produced.
  • USFWS consultation letters (a self-serve Determination Key output is not a USFWS letter).
  • State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) consultation letter referenced in NEPA.
  • Tribal coordination correspondence referenced in NEPA.
  • Air-quality / NSPS Subpart IIII compliance for the 30 kW diesel generator.
  • Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) plan for the 145-gallon fuel belly tank.
  • Final approved lift plan referenced as required for crane operations.
  • Reconciliation memo between TEP Structural Analysis (drilled pier) and Construction Drawings (pad/pier).
Item 3

Official Correspondence

17 redacted email/letter chains between NYSTA Code Compliance, PTI, Verizon, AT&T, and Tectonic/TEP/InfraServices. The chains are scanned/OCR-degraded, defeating text-search and copy/paste review — a tactic that adds friction to any cited-line review.

Produced (19)

Redacted

  • Internal NYSTA deliberations (likely §87(2)(g)). Without OCR, the precise scope of redactions cannot be enumerated.

Not Produced

  • Any correspondence with the Town of Salina beyond the certified-mail SEQRA notice.
  • Any correspondence with the Onondaga County Sheriff's Office or 911 Center.
  • Any correspondence with Liverpool Fire or Moyers Corners FD.
  • Any correspondence with FirstNet or any public-safety wireless authority.
  • Internal NYSTA emails about the FOIL request itself.
Item 4

Public Notices & Municipal Coordination

Salina was certified-mail noticed under SEQRA — to former Supervisor Nicholas Paro at 201 School Road, signed for in mid-2025 (USPS 7019 1640 0000 0800 4105). But when we asked the Town for that package, the Town Clerk searched and reported NO responsive records — even after we sent her the proof NYSTA produced. On May 20, 2026 the Clerk conceded in writing that destruction of the signed-for SEQRA correspondence is "possible." The Town received the record and now cannot find it — a Local Government Records Law (ACAL Art. 57-A / LGS-1) problem on top of a FOIL one. Current Supervisor Raul Huerta took office after the package arrived and remains an ally; the loss traces to the prior administration. See the May 20 movement update for the full email trail.

Produced (5)

Redacted

  • Property owner names on the adjacent owner survey (legitimate use of §87(2)(b) for private natural persons).

Not Produced

  • Any reply from the Town of Salina to NYSTA's certified mailing.
  • Any public hearing transcript or community meeting record.
  • Local newspaper notice (Syracuse Post-Standard or Liverpool Review).
  • Any direct mailing to adjacent property owners on Electronics Parkway, Buckley Road, or surrounding residential streets.
Item 5

Financial Compensation & Revenue

The central financial number — the Annual Fee PTI pays NYSTA for occupying public state land — was never disclosed. The Condition Rider says it is "stated on the first page of this Occupancy Permit" (§III.A) and billed in quarterly installments (§III.B), yet no figure and no invoice appears in the production. NYSTA originally invoked §87(2)(b) (personal privacy) on this corporate financial material; on appeal (May 22, 2026) it conceded that exemption was likely wrong and switched to §87(2)(i). It then released the carrier co-locator agreements unredacted — and NYSTA's own 50%-of-co-locator-fee formula (§III.D), applied to those rents, reconstructs the Authority's take at roughly $34,200/year today, rising toward ~$50,000/year as more carriers load on.

Produced (4)

Redacted

  • On the two checks: only the check numbers and the MICR bank/routing lines — the dollar amounts ($750 and $500) are visible.
  • The Annual Fee was not redacted so much as never disclosed: no dollar figure appears on the produced permit, and no quarterly invoice was produced.
  • On appeal, NYSTA conceded §87(2)(b) was likely the wrong exemption and substituted §87(2)(i) (IT-asset security) — an exemption that does not fit a contract fee.

Not Produced

  • The Annual Fee dollar figure 'stated on the first page' of Permit T3U250002 (§III.A) — the recurring rent NYSTA collects.
  • Any quarterly Annual-Fee invoice or remittance record (§III.B) — squarely responsive to Item 5, never produced.
  • PTI–AT&T Master Lease Agreement dated 8/22/2017 (governs AT&T's rent escalation; referenced in the AT&T Site Lease).
  • PTI–T-Mobile co-location agreement (T-Mobile is a designed co-locator per the TA-W5123 supplement and the elevation drawing).
Item 6

Fall Zone & Structural Safety Hazard Reports

Sabre Industries Structural Design Report (with full base reactions, Risk Category, design wind/ice), ASCE Hazard Reports, TEP Structural Analyses, Tower/Foundation Drawings, three Construction Drawing versions, the Geotechnical Investigation, Topographic Survey, FAA 1A Survey, and Wetlands Delineation. The TEP Structural Analysis was based on a drilled pier foundation; the approved Construction Drawings show pad/pier — a foundation-type mismatch that NYSTA closed without producing the reconciliation memo.

Produced (16)

Redacted

  • Engineering technical content appears largely un-redacted. Some personal email addresses on stamped drawings.

Not Produced

  • Reconciliation memo between TEP Structural Analysis (drilled pier) and Construction Drawings (pad/pier).
  • Independent third-party structural review (no peer review of Tectonic's design).
  • Project-specific ice-shedding hazard analysis.
  • Tower fire emergency response plan (the local fire department's 100-ft ladder limit is not addressed).
Item 7

Alternative Site Analysis

NYSTA Records Access Officer Jill B. Warner, May 8, 2026: "No records responsive to Item 7 were located." NYSTA admitted in writing that no engineering or planning analysis was ever conducted to demonstrate why this specific residential site was chosen over alternatives. On appeal (May 22, 2026), NYSTA certified this absence UNDER OATH in a sworn §89(3)(a) certification. This is the showcase finding for any Article 78 proceeding, hearing, or media engagement: the State swears, under oath, that nothing justifies putting a 184-foot commercial tower in a residential highway infield.

Produced: 0

NYSTA Records Access Officer Jill B. Warner, May 8, 2026: “No records responsive to Item 7 were located.”

Not Produced

  • Coverage Objective + Alternatives Analysis showing nearby candidate locations were rejected for engineering, environmental, or land-availability reasons.
  • Any document explaining why a 184-foot commercial cell tower had to go on top of a residential neighborhood, 1.25 miles from a bald eagle roost, ~100 feet from an active highway off-ramp.
  • PTI's own internal alternatives memo (typically required by carriers for siting due-diligence).
  • Any record of NYSTA requesting an alternatives analysis from PTI.

What Happens Next

The Production Triggered the 30-Day Redaction Appeal Clock.

  • By approximately June 7, 2026 — Filing an administrative redaction appeal with the NYSTA Records Appeals Officer demanding the Annual Fee, the fee check amount, and carrier sub-tenant rent terms. POL §89(4)(c) provides for fee-shifting in any subsequent Article 78.
  • Follow-up FOIL filed targeting the Verizon RFDS (Project ID 17326150) and any AT&T or T-Mobile RF emissions/propagation studies.
  • Referrals sent to the NYS Authorities Budget Office (financial audit), the Office of the State Comptroller (General Municipal Law §33), and the NYS Committee on Open Government (advisory opinion on §87(2)(b) misapplication).
  • Article 78 reserved if administrative appeal denies relief — fee-shifting under POL §89(4)(c) if we substantially prevail.